Yes it does. He's wearing spandex. To fight crime. That's ridiculous. It's the great irony of his character, he's kind of nutso himself.
As TF officially has no soul, we should no longer talk to him, and we should dismiss everything he says, since he is not responsible for his babblings, and cannot hear ours. That's why it was always like talking to a brick wall.
I'm saying that despite the spandex, he's darker than people are aware of. I'm just saying that Batman 66 should not be looked at as a proper representation of Batman. Ignorant morons to this day still believe that all comic books and graphic novels are for kids thanks to it.
I'd say most people are aware of how dark he is. Maybe not comic books in general, but public awareness of Batman is pretty high these days.
Go learn facts. There's no way you can tell me that comics like Sin City, The Dark Knight Returns, Watchmen, Ronin, etc. are for kids. Not even. It's pretty much a fact that it's a medium that has different books for all ages.
It is funny if you think of it in a parody way, but if you had NO clue that it was a parody, then you see it as the worst movie of all time, which I think it is out of all the movies I have seen thus far.
Fucking what. How can you watch a parody and not realize that it's a parody? And assuming you didn't realize it at first, how did you purposefully choose to ignore its stated purpose and pretend it was something different? And therefore, why does your false perception of what it is that blatantly distorts reality count at all?